Absolute and relative dating of fossils definition

absolute and relative dating of fossils definition

What's the difference between absolute and extreme poverty? Well, extreme poverty generally refers to a poverty line . It's a definition of the amount of income one needs to satisfy the most basic needs: absolute needs (food, shelter) plus health care, education and specific needs depending on where people live (e.g. Alaska vs Sahara).

For example, urban residents of capital cities will have greater education, energy and transportation costs than populations elsewhere. People living in extreme poverty risk from marginalization to malnutrition and disease infections.

All this causes health damages which are no doubt one of the most striking and universal effects of poverty . Here's a great video on the numbers of poverty-related deaths, the difference between absolute and relative poverty, the new causes of poverty and what we can do about them.

According to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), poverty is not a one-dimensional phenomenon (e.g. "only" a lack of money) but a multidimensional issue that requires a wide range of solutions for a wide range of problems. This definition is supported by that of the World Bank which recognizes that poverty results from several political, social and economical processes that interact in ways to make people’s living conditions worse and worse.

However the two organizations have very different approaches of poorness. The UN actually tries to define and give numbers that reflect such diverse reality by creating measures such as the  HDI (Human Development Index)  that takes into account health and education. The World Bank has a more bizarre approach in that, despite it recognizes that poverty is a multidimensional problem, yet, it sticks to a one-dimensional monetary method. You have (a bit of) money: okay; no money: poor.

But many situations prove this over-simplification dangerous (see... rest of the website!). Sometimes the lack of money is due to contaminated water that brings diseases. There are many different causes and effects of poverty that just can't be related uniquely to money.

Nevertheless both institutions recognize the same causes of poverty and the same strategies to eliminate absolute poverty. They both propose the same remedies, such as good governance underpinned by a democratic and decentralized system, and opportunities characterized by market liberalization and economic growth.

Yet it sounds significantly less great when you realize we’re actually talking about a 2% risk dropping to a 1% risk. The risk halved, but in a far less impressive fashion.

If the 5-year risk for heart attack is 2 in 100 (2%) in a group of patients treated conventionally and 1 in 100 (1%) in patients treated with the new drug, the absolute difference is derived by simply subtracting the two risks: 2% – 1% = 1%.

Steve Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
explain absolute-relative risk in a creative way. They say that knowing only the relative data is like having a 50% off coupon for selected items at a department store. But you don’t know if the coupon applies to a diamond necklace or to a pack of chewing gum. Only by knowing what the coupon’s true value is–the absolute data–does the 50% have any meaning.

In our review of a STAT story on new aspirin guidelines, we praised them for using both absolute and relative numbers. Here’s what the story said:

In a meta-analysis of the six major randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, among more than 95,000 participants, serious cardiovascular events occurred in 0.51 percent of participants taking aspirin and 0.57 percent of those not taking aspirin. That corresponds to a 20 percent relative reduction in risk. At the same time, serious bleeding events increased from 0.07 percent among non-aspirin takers to 0.10 percent among those taking aspirin, or a 40 percent relative increase in risk.

In our review of a news release from the National Institutes of Health , we called them out for only using relative risk reductions from a study about intensive blood pressure management. 

The release points out that those study participants whose blood pressure goal was 120 mm of mercury had 33 percent fewer cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks or heart failure, and had a 32 percent reduction in the risk of death, compared to those participants with a higher goal.

Hi sha1023012,
FileDialog.FileName Property will return the file name selected in the file dialog box. The file name includes both the file path and the extension, so it is an absolute path.
I’m not sure what do you mean by “I am suppose to use absolute path for the load and save buttons. But not suppose to use save dialog or open dialog “  here.  Do you mean that StreamReader will accept a relative path and you want it accept absolute path only?
If so, you can either check if the string contains a root by using Path.IsPathRooted Method or get the absolute path for the string by using Path.GetFullPath Method and compare the full path with the original string.

If you still have any doubt and concern about this issue, please let us know. If I misunderstood you, please kindly elaborate your question.
Best Regards,

3. What I am not understanding is I am suppose to use absolute path for the load and save buttons. But not suppose to use save dialog or open dialog . So I am not really understanding how else is there to do what is being asked.

Hi sha1023012,
FileDialog.FileName Property will return the file name selected in the file dialog box. The file name includes both the file path and the extension, so it is an absolute path.
I’m not sure what do you mean by “I am suppose to use absolute path for the load and save buttons. But not suppose to use save dialog or open dialog “  here.  Do you mean that StreamReader will accept a relative path and you want it accept absolute path only?
If so, you can either check if the string contains a root by using Path.IsPathRooted Method or get the absolute path for the string by using Path.GetFullPath Method and compare the full path with the original string.

If you still have any doubt and concern about this issue, please let us know. If I misunderstood you, please kindly elaborate your question.
Best Regards,

Microsoft is conducting an online survey to understand your opinion of the Msdn Web site. If you choose to participate, the online survey will be presented to you when you leave the Msdn Web site.

Cultural Relativism: Truth Is Relative
Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. It's the philosophical notion that all cultural beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the cultural environment. Those who hold to cultural relativism hold that all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity. Relativism often includes moral relativism (ethics depend on a social construct), situational relativism (right or wrong is based on the particular situation), and cognitive relativism (truth itself has no objective standard).



Relative & Absolute Cell References in Excel

Yet it sounds significantly less great when you realize we’re actually talking about a 2% risk dropping to a 1% risk. The risk halved, but in a far less impressive fashion.

If the 5-year risk for heart attack is 2 in 100 (2%) in a group of patients treated conventionally and 1 in 100 (1%) in patients treated with the new drug, the absolute difference is derived by simply subtracting the two risks: 2% – 1% = 1%.

Steve Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
explain absolute-relative risk in a creative way. They say that knowing only the relative data is like having a 50% off coupon for selected items at a department store. But you don’t know if the coupon applies to a diamond necklace or to a pack of chewing gum. Only by knowing what the coupon’s true value is–the absolute data–does the 50% have any meaning.

In our review of a STAT story on new aspirin guidelines, we praised them for using both absolute and relative numbers. Here’s what the story said:

In a meta-analysis of the six major randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, among more than 95,000 participants, serious cardiovascular events occurred in 0.51 percent of participants taking aspirin and 0.57 percent of those not taking aspirin. That corresponds to a 20 percent relative reduction in risk. At the same time, serious bleeding events increased from 0.07 percent among non-aspirin takers to 0.10 percent among those taking aspirin, or a 40 percent relative increase in risk.

In our review of a news release from the National Institutes of Health , we called them out for only using relative risk reductions from a study about intensive blood pressure management. 

The release points out that those study participants whose blood pressure goal was 120 mm of mercury had 33 percent fewer cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks or heart failure, and had a 32 percent reduction in the risk of death, compared to those participants with a higher goal.